Best Practice Checklists

An exclusive publication of

Essentials every leader should understand about IT


Issue 15 – Information Security Awareness Education and Testing

Information Security Awareness Education and Testing — download the printable PDF

Download this article as a PDF

Click Here to Download
Contact Us

Security Awareness & Phishing Testing

The one layer no firewall can patch: your people

Most serious breaches now begin with a person rather than a server: an employee clicks a convincing message, approves an unexpected login prompt, or acts on a request that looks routine. Technical controls reduce this exposure, but they cannot remove it. The human layer is the most-attacked part of any organization, and often the least maintained. The situations below happen more often than most organizations expect, and each traces back to how, and how often, staff are trained and tested.

When it goes wrong

People are less a weak link than an untended one. Most staff want to do the right thing; they simply have not been shown, recently, what today’s attacks actually look like. The point below is not to assign blame. It is to show what tends to go wrong when awareness training is treated as a one-time event rather than an ongoing practice.

One click, one password

A well-crafted email, now often written or refined with AI, imitates a trusted service and asks an employee to sign in. The employee enters their Microsoft 365 credentials on a convincing lookalike page. Minutes later an attacker is reading mail, creating hidden forwarding rules, and moving toward more valuable accounts.

If that password is reused elsewhere, one login becomes many.

The wire that did not come back

Someone in finance receives an email, or increasingly a phone call using a cloned voice, from a senior leader or a familiar vendor asking to approve a payment or update banking details. The request looks and sounds legitimate, and it is urgent, so the transfer is approved.

Business email compromise is among the costliest categories of cybercrime by reported loss.

Training that checked a box

The organization runs one training video a year. Everyone clicks through it, and no one is tested afterward. Nothing is measured, so no one knows who is actually at risk. By the time a real phishing message lands, the lesson has long since worn off.

A once-a-year lesson rarely survives contact with a real attack.

The repeat clicker no one remediated

Simulated phishing goes out, and the same few people fail it every time. The results are filed away, but no one follows up with coaching or additional testing. A known, named risk simply stays on the network.

A risk you can measure but never address is still a risk.

The common thread

None of these is really a story about a careless employee. In each case the gap was structural: training that was infrequent, generic, or never tested, and results that were collected but never acted upon. The human layer can be strengthened, but only when it is measured and maintained like any other control.

Unlike most attack surfaces, this one tends to improve with attention. People can be trained, tested, and measurably strengthened over time, provided the effort is recurring, relevant to the tactics in use today, and paired with honest testing rather than a single annual video.

Fictional phishing-awareness chart across four campaigns, with report rate rising and click rate falling. This illustrates measurement, not actual customer outcomes.
Fictional awareness-training trends, not customer results. Interpret reporting and click rates using consistent definitions and the context of each campaign. Select the image to view it at full size.

What to Ask Your IT Manager or Provider

and how to know if the answers are good ones

You do not need to run a training program to oversee one. You need to know what to ask. A short glossary of today’s tactics is provided at the end, for those who want the detail. First, the part that matters: run the checklist below with your IT professional or security provider. If any item is not marked green, it may warrant a closer look.

Formal, Recurring Program

✓
–
?
Is security awareness training formal, scheduled, and recurring throughout the year, rather than a single annual video? Short, frequent lessons tend to hold far better than one long session that is quickly forgotten.

Simulated Phishing, and Beyond Email

✓
–
?
Does the organization send simulated phishing on a regular cadence, and has testing expanded to the channels attackers now use, including text messages (smishing) and phone or voice calls (vishing)? Testing is how an organization learns whether the training actually changed behavior.

Measuring and Acting on Results

✓
–
?
Are results tracked over time, and is there a defined path for anyone who repeatedly fails, such as coaching or additional testing, rather than simply filing the numbers? Measurement without follow-up rarely changes outcomes.

Current Tactics, Including AI-Assisted Attacks

✓
–
?
Are users taught what today’s attacks look like, including messages generated or polished with AI, spoofed sender names and lookalike domains, malicious QR codes, and login prompts that arrive unexpectedly? The old advice to simply watch for typos and poor grammar is no longer sufficient.

Business Email Compromise and Payment Fraud

✓
–
?
Are staff who handle payments, payroll, or banking details trained to independently verify any request to move funds or change account information, using a known contact through a second channel? Attackers increasingly use cloned voices and a sense of urgency to rush these approvals through.

Credentials, MFA, and Prompt Fatigue

✓
–
?
Are users taught to use long, unique passwords (ideally through a password manager), never to reuse a work password elsewhere, and never to approve a multi-factor prompt they did not personally start? A common tactic is to flood a user with repeated approval prompts until one is accepted out of fatigue.

A Reporting Culture Without Blame

✓
–
?
Is there a simple, one-click way to report a suspicious message, and are staff encouraged to report promptly without fear of blame? A mistake reported within minutes can often be contained; one hidden out of embarrassment usually cannot. Reporting a possible incident should always be treated as the right decision.

Verify Before You Trust

✓
–
?
Are users taught to slow down on unexpected requests, hover over links before clicking, confirm that a web address matches the destination they intend, and never dismiss a certificate or security warning? A padlock or HTTPS alone no longer indicates a site is trustworthy, since fraudulent sites use them too.

Devices, Remote Work, and Networks

✓
–
?
Are staff expected to work from company-approved and protected devices, to avoid public or automatically connecting Wi-Fi, and to secure home networks with current wireless encryption (WPA3 where available, WPA2 at a minimum)? Remote and hybrid work widened this exposure and has not narrowed it.

Removable Media and On-Site Social Engineering

✓
–
?
Do users know never to plug in an unknown USB device, and how to recognize in-person and telephone manipulation, such as tailgating through a door, impersonated support calls, or a ‘found’ drive left in a parking lot? Not every attack arrives by email.

Data Handling and Device Discipline

✓
–
?
Are users expected to store data only in approved company locations, lock unattended workstations, keep equipment physically secure, and dispose of old media properly? Sound habits here limit the damage when something else goes wrong.

Onboarding and Role-Based Coverage

✓
–
?
Are new hires trained promptly rather than waiting for the next annual cycle, and does training reflect the different risks faced by finance, executives, and IT staff? The people most heavily targeted are often the ones a single generic course fits least.
The tactics worth namingA short glossary of how these attacks actually arrive. Optional.+

Phishing

Fraudulent messages, usually email, designed to trick a user into clicking, signing in, or replying. Modern versions are frequently written or polished with AI and carry few of the old spelling and grammar giveaways.

Spear Phishing

A phishing message tailored to a specific person, using details gathered about them, their role, or the company to make it more believable.

Business Email Compromise (BEC)

A targeted scam in which an attacker impersonates an executive, employee, or vendor to authorize a fraudulent payment or the release of sensitive data. It remains among the costliest categories of cybercrime by reported loss.

Vishing (Voice Phishing)

Phishing conducted by phone. Attackers now use AI-cloned voices to imitate a known colleague or leader convincingly.

Smishing (SMS Phishing)

Phishing delivered by text message, often posing as a delivery notice, bank alert, or password reset.

QR-Code Phishing

A malicious QR code that leads to a fraudulent site. It is often used to move the victim off a monitored company computer and onto a personal phone.

Pretexting

An invented but plausible story, for example “I am from IT and need to verify your login,” used to lower a target’s guard before the real request.

MFA Fatigue (Push Bombing)

An attacker repeatedly triggers multifactor approval prompts for a user, often after obtaining that user’s password, hoping that fatigue or distraction causes one request to be approved.

Baiting

Leaving infected USB drives or other media where a curious person is likely to find and use them.

Going deeper: habits worth teachingThe finer points that separate awareness on paper from awareness in practice. Optional.+

Passwords in Practice

Use long, unique passwords or multiword passphrases. Avoid short, common, or predictable passwords, predictable substitutions (such as “@” for “a”), researched personal details (a pet, a team, a birth year), and incremental changes that only add a number at renewal. Work passwords should not be shared, emailed, or saved in a browser.

“Secret” Questions

Literal answers to security questions (a mother’s maiden name, a first school) are often discoverable online. A stored, unrelated answer kept in a password manager is far safer.

Removable Media and Physical Access

Access cards should be guarded; some proximity cards can be copied quickly with inexpensive equipment. Cameras and microphones on a compromised device can be activated without the user’s knowledge, so covering or disabling them when not in use is a reasonable precaution.

Personal and Sensitive Information

Personally identifiable information should be kept out of ad hoc places such as spreadsheets and mail contact lists, and stored only where the organization has approved.

Social Media and Email Hygiene

Limiting the personal detail attackers can harvest, and avoiding the use of work email addresses for unrelated online accounts, both reduce the raw material available for a targeted attack.

Download the printable PDF

To review how your organization’s security awareness training and phishing testing measure up against these practices, it is recommended that you consult your Sandbox Technologies Engineer, Consulting CIO, or Account Manager. Not a client yet? Contact us here to get started.

Contact Sandbox Technologies for a free, no-obligation consultation.

Headquartered in Los Angeles. Serving clients nationwide and internationally since 1997.

Nationwide (Toll-Free)

877-930-8324

Los Angeles

424-207-5130

Support Helpdesk

424-207-5140

    By submitting this form you are confirming that you have read and agree to our Privacy Policy

    * NOTE: Hardware purchase requests submitted via this form will not be honored. Hardware sales are facilitated in support of established customer accounts only.